Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tristan Sykes's avatar

Hmmmmm..... yes, but no - "Just getting the NDC's (the Nationalally Determined Contributions) is not going to get the planet back into a safe-operating-space, right? You'd need major food transformation, you need circular economy... production/consumption pattern changes, you need energy-transition. All of these things together are the only thing that's going to get us back to a safe-operating-space for humans. So we still have a lot of challenges within this space from a comms perspective of really understanding what is the solution. If we're just going to double-down on the energy transition at the expense of the biosphere, that's not going to help us."

Undoubtably, this integrated and holistic analysis is more useful than a narrow focus on emissions, however, the "transformation" described by Kari Stoever, is still subject to the laws of physics generally and thermodynamics particularly. And, in this regard, it must be understood that all transformation of any kind requires energy and produces entropy/waste/pollution. Therefore, an enormous 'transformation' as a presupposed 'solution' to our predicament of extreme human ecological #overshoot, runs into serious conflict with the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Essentially, large scale transformation is a #hypergrowth of material extraction, exploitation, and emissions, which only serve to accelerate our predicament.

Arguably, as opposed to 'transformation' we should be rationing and triaging superfluous systems whilst using minimal pre-existing materials and energy to decelerate our trajectory. #JustStop #JustCollapse #RadicalDegrowth

Expand full comment
Obsolete Optics's avatar

Planetary Hospice

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts