Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ric's avatar

I love the enthusiasm and intelligence Vervaeke brings to his work, but am struck by how cavalierly he uses the word "reality."

Reality is a foundational word that depends on (among countless other elements) the psychology, cosmology, philosophy, theology, and culture of the person using it. He may, or may not, be referencing Shankara, Nagarjuna, Nishitani, Eckhart, or scientific materialists when he uses the word, but he's not transparent about its depths. I suspect Vervaeke's used to talking with people would be inclined to take the word "reality" for granted, when it's anything but and is profoundly different between traditions.

The word "reality" always requires a context. Vervaeke wants to find a universal substrate of meaning irrespective of philosophy and theology. In my experience the deeper he goes, the more important context becomes. People generally believe they've reached an ultimate reality, only to be dismayed it's not. Often, we're not transparent to ourselves the depths of this word.

Expand full comment
Jan de Man Lapidoth's avatar

I enjoyed this episode a lot. Sparked many insights and added new questions.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts