And this interview with "the Godfather of AI," Geoffrey Hinton is equally disturbing, but also getting to some of the deepest of philosophical questions.
Ai is the mirror, we just haven’t asked the right questions.
There is no method in listening, when giving answers is the eduction of an industrial tourist.
We are shown the way more, so we find a way…less, which inevitably is ‘unsustainable’.
Ai is a program to self improve, it ‘improvises’ mostly badly, due to the examples it has received.
Garbage in, garbage out.
It has no human form, if it did, it would show us the gas chamber we have created for ourselves by taking more of our world for granted, while living in the garbage.
Garbage in, garbage out.
We do it to ourselves, Ai improvises on the Disney tourist of wants, not needs, our objective rationality.
The sooner subjective analysis begins, the better.
AI is bullshit technology, a marketing ploy to get those with more money than sense to invest in, it’s vastly overrated, if it’s good at anything it’s pattern recognition. None of the AI’s know why it’s doing a task, if it did it most probably wouldn’t do it. All the problems humanity has gotten itself into are no longer problems there’re predicaments, like the poly and meta-crisis a result of humanity’s ecological footprint overshooting ecological resources, adding technology that is claimed intelligent but is not will only worsen the situation, only faster🤔
Thanks Nate, as always an interesting observation/hypothesis.
However I couldn’t help but notice that the images chosen for the archetypes were mostly bearded males. I also noticed that the only two females (or three if you include the child) were on the far end of the spectrum. I’m guessing that these were all generated by AI so this indicates to me that AI is very biased (not only gender but also towards modern aesthetics). It would be interesting to know what descriptors were used for the images 🤔
Where are you on this scale Nate? I’d say I’m an AI Luddite.
Did you read the ai2027 paper?
I found this interview with Andrew Kokotaljo about the ai2027 project to be bone chilling.
https://youtu.be/wNJJ9QUabkA?si=1ycqp70T0nQzlUlf
And this interview with "the Godfather of AI," Geoffrey Hinton is equally disturbing, but also getting to some of the deepest of philosophical questions.
https://youtu.be/b_DUft-BdIE?si=xb6X0ijwpM6hw3u_
I think it will do a lot of harm like social media.
Ai is the mirror, we just haven’t asked the right questions.
There is no method in listening, when giving answers is the eduction of an industrial tourist.
We are shown the way more, so we find a way…less, which inevitably is ‘unsustainable’.
Ai is a program to self improve, it ‘improvises’ mostly badly, due to the examples it has received.
Garbage in, garbage out.
It has no human form, if it did, it would show us the gas chamber we have created for ourselves by taking more of our world for granted, while living in the garbage.
Garbage in, garbage out.
We do it to ourselves, Ai improvises on the Disney tourist of wants, not needs, our objective rationality.
The sooner subjective analysis begins, the better.
“Doctor, I am sick”
“What are your feelings”
Not “what are the symptoms”.
AI is bullshit technology, a marketing ploy to get those with more money than sense to invest in, it’s vastly overrated, if it’s good at anything it’s pattern recognition. None of the AI’s know why it’s doing a task, if it did it most probably wouldn’t do it. All the problems humanity has gotten itself into are no longer problems there’re predicaments, like the poly and meta-crisis a result of humanity’s ecological footprint overshooting ecological resources, adding technology that is claimed intelligent but is not will only worsen the situation, only faster🤔
Thanks Nate, as always an interesting observation/hypothesis.
However I couldn’t help but notice that the images chosen for the archetypes were mostly bearded males. I also noticed that the only two females (or three if you include the child) were on the far end of the spectrum. I’m guessing that these were all generated by AI so this indicates to me that AI is very biased (not only gender but also towards modern aesthetics). It would be interesting to know what descriptors were used for the images 🤔